Knowledge Tree
Relations (1)
related 1.00 — strongly supporting 14 facts
Testimony serves as a primary source for the formation and justification of beliefs, as described in the basic model of testimonially-based belief [1] and the categorization of beliefs by their source [2]. Epistemological debates, such as reductionism {fact:1, fact:10} and reliabilism {fact:8, fact:9}, specifically examine how the reliability of testimony functions as a foundation for holding a belief {fact:2, fact:7}.
Facts (14)
Sources
Epistemology of Testimony | Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy iep.utm.edu 8 facts
claimGreen (2006) discusses a scenario where a testifier (T) and a hearer (S) conceptualize the object of a belief differently, such as when T tells S that object m is F, without knowing that m is the same as object n, while S knows that m is n.
claimThe basic model of testimonially-based belief involves a testifier (T) communicating a statement (p) to an epistemic subject (S), who then believes that statement (p).
perspectiveDavid Hume's reductionist perspective posits that individuals properly form beliefs based on testimony only because they have observed other confirmed instances of the veracity of human testimony, meaning testimonial justification is reducible to perceptual, memorial, and inferential justification.
claimWeiner (2003b) argues that viewing testimony as an assurance does not contradict the requirement that a recipient must have evidence for their testimonially-based beliefs.
quoteHinchman (2007) states: “[H]ow could [T] presume to provide this warrant [for S’s belief that p]? One way you could provide it is by presenting yourself to A as a reliable gauge of the truth. … The proposal … simply leaves out the act of assurance. Assuring [S] that p isn’t merely asserting that p with the thought that you thereby give [S] evidence for p, since you’re such a reliable asserter (or believer). That formula omits the most basic respect in which you address people, converse with people—inviting them to believe you, not merely what you say.”
perspectiveEpistemologists debate whether a recipient of testimony must possess beliefs or inductive support regarding the reliability of the testifier to be justified in their belief, or if the testifier's actual reliability is sufficient.
claimBeliefs can be categorized based on their source or root, such as perceptual, deductive, inductive, memorial, or testimonial.
claimBeliefs can be based on multiple sources simultaneously, such as being partly testimonially-based and partly perceptually-based, or partly inductively-based and partly memorially-based.
Epistemology | Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy iep.utm.edu 3 facts
claimReliabilism evaluates beliefs by identifying the specific cognitive process that led to their formation, such as the specific sense used, the source of testimony, the type of reasoning, or the recency of a memory.
claimKnowledge can be transmitted between individuals through testimony, where a person's justification for a belief is based on a trusted source confirming its truth.
claimReliabilism, a prominent version of externalism, suggests that the justification of a belief depends on the source of that belief, such as sense experience, reason, testimony, or memory.
Epistemological Problems of Testimony plato.stanford.edu 1 fact
claimRichard Moran's 2005 article 'Getting Told and Being Believed' analyzes the dynamics of being told information and the act of believing that testimony.
Social Epistemology – Introduction to Philosophy - Rebus Press press.rebus.community 1 fact
claimReductionism in the epistemology of testimony posits that testimony justifies belief because individuals learn through observation that testimony correlates with truth, similar to how one learns that smoke is caused by fire.
The Debate on Testimony in Social Epistemology and Its ... - MDPI mdpi.com 1 fact
claimBelief based on testimony is often epistemically superior to belief based on entirely direct, non-testimonial evidence.