Knowledge Tree
Relations (1)
related 2.00 — strongly supporting 3 facts
Peer disagreement is a central subject of study within social epistemology, as evidenced by the field's focus on the 'steadfast view' [1] and the broader academic investigation into testimony and disagreement [2]. Furthermore, social epistemology provides the theoretical framework for addressing how individuals should aggregate beliefs when encountering peer disagreement [3].
Facts (3)
Sources
Social Epistemology - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy plato.stanford.edu 1 fact
claimRussell et al. (2015) argue that social epistemology approaches focusing on individual topics of interest when addressing peer disagreement and testimony require a holistic approach to aggregation.
Social Epistemology – Introduction to Philosophy - Rebus Press press.rebus.community 1 fact
claimThe 'steadfast view' in social epistemology is the position that it is sometimes or frequently justified to continue holding one's original belief even when encountering a peer who disagrees.
Social epistemology - Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy rep.routledge.com 1 fact
claimSocial epistemologists have extensively studied testimony, expert testimony, and peer disagreement.