Knowledge Tree
Relations (1)
related 5.21 — strongly supporting 36 facts
Epiphenomenalism is a metaphysical perspective that specifically addresses the causal status of consciousness, positing that while brain processes may cause consciousness, consciousness itself lacks causal efficacy in the physical world [1], [2], [3]. This relationship is central to the mind-body problem, as philosophers debate whether consciousness is an inert byproduct or an active influence on behavior [4], [5], [6].
Facts (36)
Sources
Moving Forward on the Problem of Consciousness - David Chalmers consc.net 10 facts
claimDavid Chalmers identifies two categories of alternatives to epiphenomenalism: denying the causal closure of the physical domain to allow for interactionist dualism, or reconciling a causal role for experience with the causal closure of the physical domain.
claimDavid Chalmers suggests it may be possible to avoid epiphenomenalism while embracing the causal closure of the physical domain by adopting the correct view of the place of consciousness in the natural order.
claimDavid Hodgson argues against epiphenomenalism by appealing to common sense and suggesting that certain functions could not be performed as well without consciousness.
claimDavid Chalmers critiques David Hodgson's arguments against epiphenomenalism, stating that they rely on the intuition that consciousness plays a causal role rather than on an objective analysis of the functions themselves.
claimColin McGinn seeks to avoid epiphenomenalism in his philosophical work on consciousness.
perspectiveDavid Chalmers characterizes epiphenomenalism as an inelegant picture of nature because it presents consciousness as a 'dangling' add-on to physical processes.
claimDavid Chalmers identifies three potential metaphysical frameworks for understanding consciousness: the epiphenomenalist version, the interactionist version, and the Russellian version.
perspectiveDavid Chalmers argues that the problem of epiphenomenalism arises from the causal closure of the world generally, rather than just the causal closure of the physical world, because any causal story can be told without including or implying experience.
claimDavid Chalmers argues that human knowledge of and reference to consciousness depend on a relationship to consciousness that is tighter than mere causation, countering arguments that epiphenomenalism makes knowledge of consciousness impossible.
claimDavid Chalmers defines epiphenomenalism as the view that consciousness has no effect on the physical world.
The Hard Problem of Consciousness | Springer Nature Link link.springer.com 6 facts
claimEpiphenomenalism attempts to avoid the problems of interactionism by denying consciousness any causal role, but it fails to explain how consciousness emerges from physical processes without reducing the former to the latter.
claimInteractionism refers to approaches that attribute a causal role to consciousness, implying that mind and body influence each other, whereas epiphenomenalism refers to approaches that deny any influence of the mind on the body.
quoteDaniel Dennett argues that zombies are actual and that nobody is conscious in the mysterious way that supports doctrines like epiphenomenalism, stating: “Are zombies possible? They’re not just possible, they’re actual. We’re all zombies. Nobody is conscious — not in the systematically mysterious way that supports such doctrines as epiphenomenalism”
claimEpiphenomenalism posits that consciousness is an epiphenomenon emerging from brain activity that possesses no causal role.
perspectiveVon Stillfried argues that if epiphenomenalism is true, consciousness cannot effectuate physical events, making second-order phenomenal judgments impossible because a zombie twin would utter the same phrases without actual consciousness.
claimEpiphenomenalism remains the dominant view among scholars regarding consciousness.
Resolving the evolutionary paradox of consciousness link.springer.com 5 facts
claimEpiphenomenalism posits that physical events, such as brain processes, cause or have the property of consciousness, but conscious events do not affect physical events.
claimThe author's sensational associative learning explanation is compatible with all major metaphysical perspectives on consciousness, with the exception of epiphenomenalism.
quoteRobinson (2023) suggests an epiphenomenalist explanation that requires supporting the view that “[w]hat “pleasure” refers to in any possible world is the effect in consciousness of [neural events in a reward system] that contribute to continuance or repetition”.
perspectiveWilliam James argued against epiphenomenalism (also known as automaton-theory), which is the metaphysical perspective that consciousness is not efficacious and does not affect the physical world.
referenceEpiphenomenalism posits that behavior and the physical world would remain identical regardless of the presence or absence of consciousness, according to Robinson (2023).
Dualism (Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy/Winter 2016 Edition) plato.stanford.edu 3 facts
claimPhilosophical concepts related to the mind-body problem include behaviorism, consciousness, eliminative materialism, epiphenomenalism, functionalism, identity theory, intentionality, mental causation, neutral monism, and physicalism.
claimEpiphenomenalism is often adopted as a fall-back position because proponents find other philosophical options regarding consciousness unacceptable.
perspectiveMany philosophers reject the epiphenomenalist view of consciousness because it implies that conscious experiences—such as feeling pain, visual sensations, or understanding an argument—have no causal influence on human behavior.
Non-physicalist Theories of Consciousness cambridge.org 3 facts
claimEpiphenomenalists argue that the appearance of consciousness existing is more trustworthy than the appearance of consciousness causing physical effects because humans have direct access to their own consciousness, but not to the causal powers of that consciousness.
claimJohn Eccles and Karl Popper argued that epiphenomenalism makes the evolution of consciousness inexplicable because it renders consciousness inert and useless, and useless features do not evolve.
claimCritics argue that if one accepts the epiphenomenalist claim that appearances of causal power are false, one might also have to deny the existence of consciousness itself, as the evidence for consciousness is also based on appearance.
Hard Problem of Consciousness | Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy iep.utm.edu 2 facts
perspectiveWeak reductionists maintain adherence to physicalism because denying that consciousness is physical would render consciousness epiphenomenal, which is viewed as implausible.
perspectiveEpiphenomenalists prioritize the scientific principle of causal closure over commonsense intuition, suggesting that experimental results in science may undermine the causal efficacy of consciousness.
Panpsychism - Wikipedia en.wikipedia.org 2 facts
perspectiveDavid Chalmers argues that panpsychism offers the benefits of materialism by potentially allowing consciousness to be physical while avoiding the problem of epiphenomenalism.
claimEpiphenomenalism is the philosophical state of affairs where consciousness is separate from the physical world and therefore has no room to exert causal power on the world.
Panpsychism - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy plato.stanford.edu 2 facts
claimEmergentism faces the challenge of explaining how consciousness emerges from matter without rendering emergent features causally impotent or epiphenomenal.
referenceThe Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy entry on Panpsychism lists related entries including George Berkeley, consciousness, René Descartes, dualism, emergent properties, epiphenomenalism, Charles Hartshorne, William James, Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz, mereology, monism, neutral monism, pantheism, physicalism, qualia, quantum theory and consciousness, Josiah Royce, Baruch Spinoza, Alfred North Whitehead, and Wilhelm Maximilian Wundt.
The function(s) of consciousness: an evolutionary perspective frontiersin.org 1 fact
claimConsciousness increases the behavioral options available to an individual in ways that would not be possible if consciousness were epiphenomenal.
Critique of Panpsychism: Philosophical Coherence and Scientific ... thequran.love 1 fact
claimPanpsychism claims to avoid the eliminativist or epiphenomenalist tendencies of hardline physicalism by refusing to treat consciousness as an illusion or a byproduct with no causal power.
AI Sessions #9: The Case Against AI Consciousness (with Anil Seth) conspicuouscognition.com 1 fact
claimDan Williams argues that defining intelligence as 'doing' and consciousness as 'what it is like to have an experience' risks committing to epiphenomenalism, because it treats consciousness as a mysterious qualitative phenomenon distinct from an organism's functional capabilities rather than an evolved trait with fitness advantages.