consciousness ↔ Language Model

Relations (1)

related 0.30 — supporting 3 facts

The relationship between consciousness and language models is defined by Anil Seth's perspective, which distinguishes between the two by noting that while language models can simulate an illusion of consciousness [1], they lack actual consciousness [2]. Seth further argues that achieving true understanding in language models is a more realistic technological goal than attaining consciousness [3].

Facts (3)

Sources

AI Sessions #9: The Case Against AI Consciousness (with Anil Seth) conspicuouscognition.com Conspicuous Cognition 3 facts

perspectiveAnil Seth suggests that language models, particularly those embodied in a world and trained while embodied, could potentially be described as 'understanding' things, even if they lack consciousness.

perspectiveAnil Seth believes that the criteria for a language model to achieve true understanding are more achievable through current technological trajectories than the criteria for achieving consciousness.

perspectiveAnil Seth asserts that AI is not conscious, but notes that interacting with language models creates a cognitively impenetrable illusion of consciousness, similar to visual illusions where known facts do not override perception.