Relations (1)

related 2.32 — strongly supporting 4 facts

Neuroscience and the philosophy of mind are deeply interconnected fields, as evidenced by scholarly works like Paul Churchland's [1] and Alvin I. Goldman's [2] that bridge both disciplines. Furthermore, these fields are frequently debated together in critiques of consciousness [3] and are the subject of modern integrative proposals aimed at reconciling representationalism with neuroscientific findings [4].

Facts (4)

Sources
Hard problem of consciousness - Wikipedia en.wikipedia.org Wikipedia 2 facts
claimPeter Hacker's critique of the hard problem of consciousness is directed against contemporary philosophy of mind and neuroscience more broadly, not just David Chalmers' formulation.
claimProposals made in the 2020s suggest that a cognitively inspired form of representationalism can reconcile neuroscience and the philosophy of mind by bridging gaps regarding concepts such as intentionality, emergence, consciousness, and qualia.
Not Minds, but Signs: Reframing LLMs through Semiotics - arXiv arxiv.org arXiv 1 fact
referencePaul Churchland's 1989 book 'A Neurocomputational Perspective: The Nature of Mind and the Structure of Science' discusses the intersection of neuroscience and the philosophy of mind.
Self-Consciousness - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy plato.stanford.edu Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy 1 fact
referenceAlvin I. Goldman authored the book 'Simulating Minds: The Philosophy, Psychology, and Neuroscience of Mindreading', published by Oxford University Press in 2006.