nuclear agreement ↔ The New York Times

Relations (1)

cross_type 2.00 — strongly supporting 3 facts

The New York Times has extensively reported on and provided editorial perspectives regarding the nuclear agreement with Iran, as evidenced by their coverage of the deal's limitations in [1] and their editorial arguments supporting the agreement in [2] and [3].

Facts (3)

Sources

Editorials Supporting an Iran Nuclear Deal, January - September 2015 armscontrol.org Arms Control Association 3 facts

perspectiveThe New York Times editorial board argued on February 25, 2015, that any nuclear agreement with Iran must be evaluated based on the complete package rather than individual provisions, noting that the risk of walking away from negotiations could allow Iran to continue nuclear activities without restrictions.

perspectiveThe New York Times editorial board argued on March 7, 2015, that the United States Congress should support a verifiable nuclear deal with Iran rather than engaging in political games that could isolate the United States, dismantle the sanctions regime, and leave Iran's nuclear program unrestricted.

quoteThe New York Times stated that the final nuclear deal with Iran announced by the United States and other major world powers puts strong, verifiable limits on Iran’s ability to develop a nuclear weapon for at least 10 to 15 years.