Knowledge Tree
Relations (1)
related 3.32 — strongly supporting 9 facts
The concepts are related because the scoping review serves as the methodological framework used to synthesize and analyze existing research on sustainable healthy diets, as evidenced by [1], [2], and [3]. The review specifically maps indicators and evaluates the literature surrounding sustainable healthy diets to address gaps in current definitions and measurement practices [4], [5], and [6].
Facts (9)
Sources
A Scoping Review of Indicators for Sustainable Healthy Diets frontiersin.org 7 facts
claimThe authors of the scoping review conclude that the large number of unique indicators currently used in research creates challenges for stakeholders attempting to identify appropriate measures for sustainable healthy diets.
claimThe authors of the scoping review suggest that measures registries could provide the necessary decision-support for stakeholders to select appropriate indicators for sustainable healthy diets.
procedureThe scoping review mapped all identified indicators to one of three main aspects used to define sustainable healthy diets: health, environmental, and sociocultural aspects.
procedureThe authors conducted a scoping review of empirical studies to describe how sustainable healthy diets are defined and measured in research literature, specifically addressing how they have been defined since 2010 and what range of indicators is currently in use.
referenceThe authors utilized a modified scoping review design, as described by Peters et al. (2015), to synthesize evidence on sustainable healthy diets because scoping reviews are effective for mapping and charting heterogeneous data sources.
measurementA scoping review of 103 empirical articles published between January 2010 and February 2020 found that 57.3% of these articles were published after 2017.
measurementIn a scoping review of 103 empirical articles regarding sustainable healthy diets, 74% of the studies were conducted in high-income countries.