source code ↔ peer review

Relations (1)

related 2.00 — strongly supporting 3 facts

Source code and peer review are linked as core components of software development methodologies, where the accessibility of source code is a prerequisite for conducting effective peer review [1], [2], and [3].

Facts (3)

Sources

Understanding Open-source Licenses: Key factors to Consider leanix.net LeanIX 1 fact

claimOpen-source software security is enhanced because the public availability of source code allows for continuous peer review, enabling vulnerabilities to be identified and fixed quickly.

The Open Source Definition (Annotated) opensource.org Open Source Initiative 1 fact

perspectiveThe Open Source Initiative asserts that the ability to read source code is insufficient for independent peer review and rapid evolutionary selection, which requires the ability to experiment with and redistribute modifications.

Building Leadership in an Open Source Community linuxfoundation.org The Linux Foundation 1 fact

procedureThe 12 recommended best practices for innersourcing are: (1) Improve testing methods, automate it, and make it an integral part of the development process; (2) Enforce peer review and implement tools to automate the practice; (3) Make source code accessible to everyone in your organization; (4) Adopt development tools with collaboration support built into it; (5) Adopt the “Release Early and Often” philosophy (shorter, more frequent releases); (6) Invest time and effort into building scalable and modular architectures that allow code re-use; (7) Adopt a continuous integration approach; (8) Encourage fluid and open communication, and practice it; (9) Improve documentation practices and use it as an additional means for quality assurance; (10) Make it possible for people to commit code even though they are not part of the project; (11) Increase transparency of decision making process (establish trust); (12) Empower individuals according to their contributions (meritocracy).