Relations (1)

related 2.58 — strongly supporting 5 facts

The Federal Bureau of Investigation and the National Reconnaissance Office are linked as key agencies proposed to participate in a unified UAP intelligence fusion center, as described by former Pentagon officials in [1], [2], [3], [4], and [5].

Facts (5)

Sources
How the Pentagon Started Taking U.F.O.s Seriously | The New Yorker newyorker.com The New Yorker 5 facts
perspectiveA former Pentagon official stated that the government needed a system similar to post-9/11 fusion centers, where Department of Defense, F.B.I., and National Reconnaissance Office personnel could share information, to properly handle UAP intelligence.
claimThe successor to the AATIP program argued that the government needed a process similar to post-9/11 fusion centers to handle uncategorizable observations, allowing different agencies like the D.O.D., F.B.I., and N.R.O. to share information.
claimAn unnamed former Pentagon official suggested that the government needed a UAP reporting structure similar to post-9/11 fusion centers to facilitate communication between the Department of Defense, the FBI, and the NRO.
perspectiveA former Pentagon official stated that the government needed a system similar to post-9/11 fusion centers, where Department of Defense, F.B.I., and National Reconnaissance Office personnel could share information, to avoid missing intelligence.
perspectiveThe former Pentagon official advocated for a U.A.P. reporting structure similar to post-9/11 fusion centers, which would facilitate communication between the Department of Defense, the F.B.I., and the National Reconnaissance Office.